Corrigendum: Ex vivo normothermic preservation of a kidney graft from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death over 73 hours.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1330043.].

Midnight Cortisol is Associated with Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diabetic Neuropathy in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Undergoing Simultaneous Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: An increased midnight cortisol (MC) has been described in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and type 1 diabetes (T1D). Lower circulating levels of the cytokine soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK) have been found in T1D and ESKD and associated with cardiovascular (CV) events in the latter. We aimed to study MC and sTWEAK in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients, and the association of these markers with CV risk factors and transplant outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including subjects with T1D who received a first SPKT between 2008 and 2020. MC and sTWEAK at baseline were correlated with CV risk factors and evolution 1 year after SPKT. RESULTS: We included 29 subjects (58.6% women, mean age 43.5 ± 7.5 years, diabetes duration 31.9 ± 9.4 years). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased directly with MC quartiles, despite similar hypertension prevalence (p < 0.05). At 1 year, antihypertensive treatment was deintensified in those in lower MC quartiles (p < 0.05). Diabetic neuropathy prevalence decreased progressively in higher cortisol quartiles (p for trend = 0.005). Low MC was associated with delayed kidney graft function (p for trend = 0.044), and high sTWEAK with kidney graft rejection (p for trend = 0.018). In multivariate analyses, MC (standardized-ß 0.505, p = 0.004) and age (standardized-ß - 0.460, p = 0.040) were independently correlated with SBP, and MC was independently associated with the presence of diabetic neuropathy (OR 0.633, 95% CI 0.425-0.944, p = 0.025), adjusted for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, lower MC was associated with a lower baseline SBP, an improvement of antihypertensive treatment 1 year after transplant, and a higher diabetic neuropathy prevalence in SPKT recipients.

Challenges in perioperative blood transfusions in kidney transplantation and the need for Patient Blood Management.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is highly prevalent in end-stage chronic kidney disease patients, increasing their risk of receiving blood transfusions during and on the days after a kidney transplant (KTx) surgery. However, there is currently a lack of data that thoroughly describes this phenomenon in this population, the associated risk factors, and how they could benefit from the application of Patient Blood Management (PBM) guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational study. All adult patients who received a KTx between January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021, were included and followed up to six months after transplantation. Those who received a multiorgan transplant, whose data was missing in the electronic health records, and who had primary non-function were excluded. We recorded donor and recipient characteristics, cold ischemia time, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, iron status deficiency biomarkers, incidence of delayed graft function and biopsy-proven graft rejections, and graft function at discharge and 6 months after transplantation. RESULTS: We found that a high amount (39%) of KTx recipients required at least one blood transfusion during the perioperative period. And that 1) most of these patients had anemia at the time of transplantation (85.4%), 2) iron status upon admission was associated with the transfusion of more blood units (3.9 vs 2.7, p=0.019), 3) surgical reintervention (OR 7.28, 2.35-22.54) and deceased donor donation (OR 1.99, 1.24-3.21) were associated with an increased risk of transfusion, and finally, 4) there was an association between a higher number of blood units transfused and impaired kidney graft function six months after hospital discharge (1.6 vs 1.9, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PBM guidelines should be applied to patients on the KTx deceased donor waiting list and especially those scheduled to receive a transplant from a living donor. This could potentially increase the utilization efficiency of blood products and avoid transfusion-related severe adverse effects.

Early kinetics of donor-derived cell-free DNA after transplantation predicts renal graft recovery and long-term function.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) upon transplantation is one of the most impactful events that the kidney graft suffers during its life. Its clinical manifestation in the recipient, delayed graft function (DGF), has serious prognostic consequences. However, the different definitions of DGF are subject to physicians' choices and centers' policies, and a more objective tool to quantify IRI is needed. Here, we propose the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) for this scope. METHODS: ddcfDNA was assessed in 61 kidney transplant recipients of either living or deceased donors at 24 h, and 7, 14 and 30 days after transplantation using the AlloSeq cfDNA Kit (CareDx, San Francisco, CA, USA). Patients were followed-up for 6 months and 7-year graft survival was estimated through the complete and functional iBox tool. RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour ddcfDNA was associated with functional DGF [7.20% (2.35%-15.50%) in patients with functional DGF versus 2.70% (1.55%-4.05%) in patients without it, P = .023] and 6-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (r = -0.311, P = .023). At Day 7 after transplantation, ddcfDNA was associated with dialysis duration in DGF patients (r = 0.612, P = .005) and worse 7-year iBox-estimated graft survival probability (ß -0.42, P = .001) at multivariable analysis. Patients with early normalization of ddcfDNA (<0.5% at 1 week) had improved functional iBox-estimated probability of graft survival (79.5 ± 16.8%) in comparison with patients with 7-day ddcfDNA ≥0.5% (67.7 ± 24.1%) (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: ddcfDNA early kinetics after transplantation reflect recovery from IRI and are associated with short-, medium- and long-term graft outcome. This may provide a more objective estimate of IRI severity in comparison with the clinical-based definitions of DGF.

Impact of robotic-assisted kidney transplantation on post-transplant infections: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the incidence, epidemiology, clinical characteristics and risk factors of infections in living donor kidney transplant recipients using robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) and open approach. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study from January 2016 to December 2019. For the risk factor analysis, a matched case-control study (1:1 ratio) was performed (robotic vs open). Control subjects were matched for living donor and time of transplantation. The data included de novo immunosuppressive regimen, delayed graft function, urological complications, acute allograft rejection and incidence, clinical features, microbiological findings and outcomes of infections. RESULTS: Ninety-four RAKT and 84 controls were included. There were no differences between groups in terms of age, gender, BMI, median days of hospitalization, immunosuppressive regimen, need for surgical urologic procedures post-transplantation, presence of urinary leak or acute allograft rejection. Thirty-five percent of all recipients analyzed presented an infection, mostly asymptomatic bacteriuria (49%), symptomatic urinary tract infection (31%) and surgical site infection (10%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequent isolated microorganism in 67%, followed by E. coli (20%), Enterococcus faecalis (17%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%). Eight percent of the microorganisms were multidrug resistant. The open kidney transplantation group presented more infections compared to RAKT (43 vs 27%, p = 0.04). After multivariate analysis, need for surgical urologic procedure post-transplantation (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.1-35), BMI ≥ 30 (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.5-9) and acute allograft rejection (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.5) were associated with infection, whereas RAKT (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) and the use of JJ catheter (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.72) were protective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Infection is a frequent event in patients receiving a living donor kidney transplant. Acute allograft rejection, need for surgical urologic procedure post-transplantation and BMI were associated with infection, whereas robotic surgery was a protective factor in living donor kidney transplantation.

Living donor-gifted allograft lithiasis: surgical experience after bench surgery stone removal and follow-up.

This study presents the surgical experience and long-term outcomes of living donor kidney transplantations involving asymptomatic kidney stones, using ex vivo flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) during bench surgery for stone removal. Out of 1743 living kidney donors assessed between January 2012 and October 2022, 18 (1%) were diagnosed with urolithiasis. Among them, 12 donors were rejected, and 6 were accepted for kidney donation. Stone removal was successfully performed using f-URS during bench surgery, with no immediate complications or acute rejections observed. The study analyzed six living kidney transplants, of which 4 (67%) donors and three recipients were female, and 4 (67%) donors were blood-related to the recipient. The median age for donors and recipients was 57.5 and 51.5 years, respectively. The stones, primarily located in the lower calyx, had a median size of 6 mm. The median cold ischemia time during surgery was 41.6 min, and ex vivo f-URS ensured complete stone removal in all cases. After a median follow-up of 120 months, the remaining grafts were functioning well, and no urinary stone recurrence was observed in either the recipients or living donors. The findings suggest that bench f-URS is a safe approach for managing urinary stones in kidney grafts, providing good functional outcomes without stone recurrence in selected cases.

Proposal for a Two-Tier Re-classification of Stage IV/M1 domain of Renal Cell Carcinoma into M1 ("Oligometastatic") and M2 ("Polymetastatic") subdomains: Analysis of the Registry for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (REMARCC).

Purpose: We hypothesized that two-tier re-classification of the "M" (metastasis) domain of the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) may improve staging accuracy than the current monolithic classification, as advancements in the understanding of tumor biology have led to increased recognition of the heterogeneous potential of metastatic RCC (mRCC). Methods: Multicenter retrospective analysis of patients from the REMARCC (REgistry of MetAstatic RCC) database. Patients were stratified by number of metastases into two groups, M1 (≤3, "Oligometastatic") and M2 (>3, "Polymetastatic"). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier (KMA) analysis were utilized for outcomes, and receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) was utilized to assess diagnostic accuracy compared to current "M" staging. Results: 429 patients were stratified into proposed M1 and M2 groups (M1 = 286/M2 = 143; median follow-up 19.2 months). Cox-regression revealed M2 classification as an independent risk factor for worsened all-cause mortality (HR=1.67, p=0.001) and cancer-specific mortality (HR=1.74, p<0.001). Comparing M1-oligometastatic vs. M2-polymetastatic groups, KMA revealed significantly higher 5-year OS (36% vs. 21%, p<0.001) and 5-year CSS (39% vs. 17%, p<0.001). ROC analyses comparing OS and CSS, for M1/M2 reclassification versus unitary M designation currently in use demonstrated improved c-index for OS (M1/M2 0.635 vs. unitary M 0.500) and CSS (M1/M2 0.627 vs. unitary M 0.500). Conclusion: Subclassification of Stage "M" domain of mRCC into two clinical substage categories based on metastatic burden corresponds to distinctive tumor groups whose oncological potential varies significantly and result in improved predictive capability compared to current staging.

Diabetic Neuropathy Is Independently Associated With Worse Graft Outcomes and Incident Cardiovascular Disease After Pancreas Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Type 1 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Information about the impact of diabetic neuropathy (DN) on outcomes after pancreas transplantation (PT) is scarce. We assessed the independent relationship between DN markers with both graft survival and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) after transplantation. METHODS: A cohort study in individuals with type 1 diabetes and end-stage kidney disease who underwent PT between 1999 and 2015 was conducted. DN was assessed with vibration perception thresholds (VPTs) and orthostatic hypotension (pre-PT and 6 mo, 2-3, 5-6, and 8-10 y after transplantation). Pretransplantation and posttransplantation DN markers were related with graft failure/dysfunction and incident CVD during follow-up. RESULTS: We included 187 participants (70% men, age 39.9 ± 7.1 y, diabetes duration 27.1 y), with a median follow-up of 11.3 y. Abnormal VPTs (≥25 V) were observed in 53%. After transplantation, VPTs improved (22.4 ± 8.4 pretransplant versus 16.1 ± 6.1 V at 8-10 y post-PT; P < 0.001); additionally, the prevalence of abnormal VPTs decreased (53% pretransplant versus 24.4% at 8-10 y; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, blood pressure, body mass index, and previous CVD, pretransplant VPTs ≥25 V were independently associated with pancreas graft failure/dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01 [1.01-4.00]) and incident CVD (HR, 2.57 [1.17-5.64]). Furthermore, persistent abnormal VPTs after 6 mo posttransplantation were associated with the worst outcomes (HR, 2.80 [1.25-6.23] and HR, 3.19 [1.14-8.96], for graft failure/dysfunction and incident CVD, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with type 1 diabetes and end-stage kidney disease, PT was associated with an improvement of VPTs. This simple and widely available DN study was independently associated with pancreas graft function and CVD posttransplantation.

Ex vivo normothermic preservation of a kidney graft from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death over 73 hours.

The transplant community is focused on prolonging the ex vivo preservation time of kidney grafts to allow for long-distance kidney graft transportation, assess the viability of marginal grafts, and optimize a platform for the translation of innovative therapeutics to clinical practice, especially those focused on cell and vector delivery to organ conditioning and reprogramming. We describe the first case of feasible preservation of a kidney from a donor after uncontrolled circulatory death over a 73-h period using normothermic perfusion and analyze hemodynamic, biochemical, histological, and transcriptomic parameters for inflammation and kidney injury. The mean pressure and flow values were 71.24 ± 9.62 mmHg and 99.65 ± 18.54 mL/min, respectively. The temperature range was 36.7°C-37.2°C. The renal resistance index was 0.75 ± 0.15 mmHg/mL/min. The mean pH was 7.29 ± 0.15. The lactate concentration peak increased until 213 mg/dL at 6 h, reaching normal values after 34 h of perfusion (8.92 mg/dL). The total urine output at the end of perfusion was 1.185 mL. Histological analysis revealed no significant increase in acute tubular necrosis (ATN) severity as perfusion progressed. The expression of KIM-1, VEGF, and TGFß decreased after 6-18 h of perfusion until 60 h in which the expression of these genes increased again together with the expression of ß-catenin, Ki67, and TIMP1. We show that normothermic perfusion can maintain a kidney graft viable ex vivo for 3 days, thus allowing a rapid translation of pre-clinical therapeutics to clinical practice.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation.

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Orthotopic kidney transplantation survival and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: To determine graft and patient survival and adverse events in patients who undergo orthotopic kidney transplantation. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We search in Medline, Embase, and Central from inception to nowadays. We included observational studies with patients who undergo orthotopic kidney transplantation. The primary outcomes were overall patient and graft survival. We pooled the information in a frequency meta-analysis with a 95% CI. We analyzed bias with the STROBE statement. Results: Of the 106 papers initially retrieved, four met the inclusion criteria. Vascular and urinary tract complications were reported in 19% and 15%, respectively. The overall patient survival was 92% 95%CI (88% to 95%), I2 = 0%, and the overall graft survival was 88% 95 CI (83% to 91%), I2 = 0%. Conclusion: Our analysis showed a high survival rate in patients and kidney grafts after orthotopic kidney transplantation, with a similar complication rate compared to a heterotopic kidney transplant.

Preemptive simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation has survival benefit to patients.

Several organ allocation protocols give priority to wait-listed simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplant recipients to mitigate the higher cardiovascular risk of patients with diabetes mellitus on dialysis. The available information regarding the impact of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation on recipient and graft outcomes is nonetheless controversial. To help resolve this, we explored the influence of preemptive simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplants on patient and graft survival through a retrospective analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database, encompassing 9690 simultaneous transplant recipients between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analysis was performed applying a propensity score analysis to minimize bias. Of these patients, 1796 (19%) were transplanted preemptively. At ten years, recipient survival was significantly superior in the preemptive group when compared to the non-preemptive group (78.9% vs 71.8%). Dialysis at simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation was an independent significant risk for patient survival (hazard ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval 1.32-2.09]), especially if the dialysis duration was 12 months or longer. Preemptive transplantation was also associated with significant superior kidney graft survival compared to those on dialysis (death-censored: 84.3% vs 75.4%, respectively; estimated half-life of 38.57 [38.33 -38.81] vs 22.35 [22.17 - 22.53] years, respectively). No differences were observed between both groups neither for pancreas graft survival nor for post-transplant surgical complications. Thus, our results sustain the relevance of early referral for pancreas transplantation and the importance of pancreas allocation priority in reducing patient mortality after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation.

Patient Experience in Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation-A Methodological Approach Towards Innovation in an Established Program.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) leads to increased survival and quality of life, and is an alternative treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and end-stage kidney disease. Due to the particularities of this population (often with multiple comorbidities) and of the surgery (only performed in a few centers), a comprehensive analysis of patients' experience along the SPKT process is crucial to improve patient care and add value to this procedure. Therefore, we applied a systematic and iterative methodology with the participation of both patients and professional teams working together to explore and identify unmet needs and value-adding steps along the transplant patient journey at an established pancreas transplant program. Four main steps (to comprehend, to explore, to experiment and to assess) led to several interventions around three major areas: Administration and logistics, information and communication, and perceived quality of assistance. As a result, both displacements to the hospital for diagnostic purposes and the time delay involved in joining the patient waiting list for transplantation were reduced in parallel to the administrative procedures. In conclusion, the methodological implementation of key organizational changes has great impact on overall patient experience. Further quantitative analysis from the patient's perspective will consolidate our program and may add new prototype service design components.

Impact of Metastasectomy on Cancer Specific and Overall Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the REMARCC Registry.

BACKGROUND: Treatment paradigms for management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are evolving. We examined impact of surgical metastasectomy on survival across in mRCC stratified by risk-group. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective analysis from the Registry of Metastatic RCC database. The cohort was subdivided utilizing Motzer criteria (favorable-, intermediate-, high-risk). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM)/overall survival (OS); secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality (CSM)/cancer-specific survival (CSS). Impact of metastasectomy was analyzed via Cox-Regression analysis adjusting for potential prognostic variables and Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) within each risk-group. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-one patients (59 favorable-risk, 274 intermediate-risk, 98 high-risk; median follow-up 27.2 months) were analyzed. Metastasectomy was performed in 22 (37%), 66 (24%), and 32 (16%) of favorable-, intermediate- and high-risk groups (P = .012). Median number of metastases at diagnosis differed significantly (favorable-risk 2, intermediate-risk 3.4, high-risk 5.1, P < .001). On Cox-regression, high-risk (HR = 1.72, P = .002) was associated with worsened ACM, while metastasectomy was associated with improved ACM (HR = 0.56, P = .005). On KMA, median OS (months) was longer with metastasectomy in favorable- (92.7 vs. 25.8, P = .003) and intermediate-risk (26.3 vs. 20.1, P = .038), but not high-risk (P = .911) groups. Metastasectomy was associated with longer CSS in favorable- (76.1 vs. 32.8, P = .004) but not intermediate- (P = .06) and high-risk (P = .595) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Metastasectomy was independently associated with improved ACM and CSM, as well as improved CSS and OS in favorable- and intermediate-risk mRCC patients. Metastasectomy may be considered as component of multimodal management strategy in favorable and intermediate-risk subgroups. In high-risk patients, metastasectomy should be deferred except in select circumstances.

Outcomes after 20 years of experience in minimally invasive living-donor nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The transperitoneal laparoscopic approach is considered the gold standard technique for living kidney donation. Other accepted laparoscopic techniques include the retroperitoneal approach, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-assisted, laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), with excellent results in the donor and graft. Many studies have compared these techniques with open ones. Our objective is to describe our experience and results in minimally invasive living-donor nephrectomies (MILDN): laparoscopic, NOTES-assisted, and LESS since their introduction in March 2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of donors undergoing MILDN between March 2002 and March 2020. RESULTS: A total of 714 MILDNs were performed at our centre. All were completed, except for one, because of recipient death. The conventional laparoscopic approach was used in 541 cases (75.88%), NOTES in 116 (16.9%), LESS in 55 (7.7%), and one mini open (0.14%). Two-thirds of the donors were females (478 cases). The mean donor age was 52.87 years (SD 10.93). Six donors (0.8%) were diagnosed beforehand with a small renal mass, which was removed before transplantation in bench surgery. The right kidney was removed in 17.8% of cases. Warm ischaemia time was higher in the NOTES and LESS groups. We had eight conversions. The global intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were 6.8% and 4.9%, respectively. None of the donors developed renal disease during follow-up (mean 3.68 years). Five-year recipient and graft survival rates were 98.8% and 96.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MILDN techniques are safe for donors and grafts, with low complication.

Donor robotic-assisted laparoscopy for uterus transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine transplantation has proven to be a viable solution in cases of absolute uterine factor infertility. Performing uterine explant surgery is one of the most difficult gynecologic surgical challenges owing to the complexity of the uterine vascular system. The goal of this video is to demonstrate uterine explant surgery and highlight the critical anatomy involved in this procedure. DESIGN: In this video, we display, narrate, and illustrate key portions of right pelvic dissection, which was subsequently performed bilaterally to achieve hysterectomy from a living donor for the purpose of uterine transplantation. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): The donor was a 39-year-old woman, and the receptor sister suffers from Rokitansky syndrome. A careful right site pelvic dissection was visualized in this operation during a hysterectomy with the aim of performing a uterine graft implantation in a living donor (Research Ethics Committee and the Assistance Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona [HCB/2016/0111] and Bioethics Committee of Catalunya Study included in ClinicalTrials.org registry [NCT04314869]). INTERVENTION(S): The donor's surgery was performed entirely using robotic surgery (DaVinci Xi, Intuitive Survival Inc.). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Assessment of uterine graft transplant viability. RESULT(S): Good quality arterial and venous pedicles were obtained during the surgery. The difficulty of this procedure is the extensive vascular dissection that has to be done to isolate the veins that drain the uterus until the hypogastric vein. CONCLUSION(S): Pelvic anatomy dissection for obtaining the graft from the donor in uterus transplantation is complex, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery may help to provide a clear and more precise visualization.

Impact of Simultaneous Pancreas-kidney Transplantation on Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in patients with type 1 diabetes. Of the available risk predictors for this population, the Steno Type 1 Risk Engine (STENO T1) is the only one that includes kidney function as a risk factor, which is a well-described independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We explore how simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) modifies the predicted cardiovascular risk by the STENO T1 through a retrospective study including recipients of a first SPKT between 2000 and 2016. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-eight SPKT recipients with a mean age of 40 y old and a median follow-up of 10 y were included. Before transplantation, the expected incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) at 5 and 10 y according to STENO T1 would have been 31% and 50%, respectively, contrasting with an actual incidence of 9.3% and 16% for the same timepoints, respectively (P < 0.05). These differences were attenuated when STENO T1 was recalculated assuming 12th-mo glomerular filtration rate (at 5 and 10 y predicted CVE incidence was 10.5% and 19.4%, respectively). Early pancreas graft failure (hazard ratio [HR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-7.88; P = 0.02) was an independent risk factor for post-SPKT CVE, alongside kidney graft failure (HR 2.90, 95% CI, 1.53-5.48; P = 0.001), and diabetes duration (HR 1.04, 95% CI, 1.00-1.09, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: SPKT decreases in more than two-thirds of the predicted cardiovascular risk by the STENO T1. A functioning pancreas graft further reduces CVE risk, independently of kidney graft function.

[Orthotopic renal allograft transplant. State of the art.] / Trasplante renal ortotópico. Estado actual.

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)as it has shown a better quality of life and longer survival compared to dialysis. Patients with ESRD have associated vascular pathology in a significant percentage, with abundant calcifications at the level of the aorto-iliac axis.The survival of transplanted patients has also increased so an important number of patients have multiple transplants,patients with an indication for a third, fourth and even fifth transplant.In these cases, in which the iliac fossa is no longer practicable(atheromatosis, vascular abnormalities, occupied iliac fossae for previous kidney transplant…), orthotopic kidney transplantation offers a viable option with good results.

El trasplante renal es el tratamiento de elección para pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica terminal (IRCT) ya que ha demostrado una mejor calidadd e vida y mayor supervivencia en comparación ala diálisis. Los pacientes con IRCT tienen asociada patología vascular en un importante porcentaje, con abundantes calcificaciones a nivel del eje aorto-ilíaco. La supervivencia de los pacientes trasplantados también se ha incrementado por lo que cada vez más nos encontramos con pluritrasplantados, pacientes con indicación de tercer, cuarto e incluso quinto trasplante.En estos casos en los que la fosa ilíaca ya no es practicable (ateromatosis, malformaciones vasculares, ocupación de fosas ilíacas por trasplantes renales previos…),el trasplante renal ortotópico ofrece una opción viable con buenos resultados.

Trasplante renal ortotópico. Estado actual / Trapianto renale ortotopico. Stato attuale

El trasplante renal es el tratamiento deelección para pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónicaterminal (IRCT) ya que ha demostrado una mejor calidad de vida y mayor supervivencia en comparación ala diálisis. Los pacientes con IRCT tienen asociada patología vascular en un importante porcentaje, con abundantes calcificaciones a nivel del eje aorto-ilíaco. Lasupervivencia de los pacientes trasplantados también seha incrementado por lo que cada vez más nos encontramos con pluritrasplantados, pacientes con indicaciónde tercer, cuarto e incluso quinto trasplante.En estos casos en los que la fosa ilíaca ya no es practicable (ateromatosis, malformaciones vasculares, ocupación de fosas ilíacas por trasplantes renales previos...),el trasplante renal ortotópico ofrece una opción viablecon buenos resultados.(AU)

Kidney transplantation is the treatment ofchoice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)as it has shown a better quality of life and longer survivalcompared to dialysis. Patients with ESRD have associated vascular pathology in a significant percentage, withabundant calcifications at the level of the aorto-iliac axis.The survival of transplanted patients has also increasedso an important number of patients have multiple transplants, patients with an indication for a third, fourth andeven fifth transplant.In these cases, in which the iliac fossa is no longer practicable (atheromatosis, vascular abnormalities, occupiediliac fossae for previous kidney transplant...) , orthotopickidney transplantation offers a viable option with goodresults.(AU)